Skip to main content
Tessa NewsLink
Paste a health news link, or browse
Latest checks

NewsLink for health stories

Know what the study really says.

Paste a health news link. NewsLink finds the source paper and gives you the plain-English takeaway first.

Add us on Google (opens in a new tab)
Follow the evidence trail
1
2

NewsLink checks it

Mostly supported

Each claim is compared with the study. The result is written as a simple takeaway first.

  • 4 supported
  • 1 not covered
View claim-by-claim evidence
3
Next: explore more

Keep exploring

Real examples, or a current headline.

Finished reports open instantly. New checks take about three minutes.

See how the truth scale works

100% supportedSupported.All claims are supported by the study.
>67% supportedMostly supported.More than 67% of claims are supported.
34-66% supportedMixed.Between 34% and 66% of claims are supported.
<33% supportedMostly not supported.Less than 33% of claims are supported.
0% supportedNot supported.No claims are supported by the study.

Or check one of the latest

Now see what each answer means

From the evidence desk

Latest checks

Fresh checks worth opening, sharing, or taking apart claim by claim.

View all checks

medicalxpress.com ·

Six-gene scoring system could help predict leukemia survival

Checked

medicalxpress.com ·

ESMO: New analysis reinforces survival benefits of targeted therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

Checked

medicalxpress.com ·

Real-world results confirm benefit of antigen therapy for prostate cancer

Mixed
6 claims

Every claim gets one of four answers

Each claim keeps its own verdict, and each story gets a simple five-point overall rating based on checked claims only.

  • Holds upThe study really does say what the story says it says.
  • OverstatedThe story goes further than the study's own findings.
  • Not supportedThe study doesn't back this up.
  • Not coveredThe study doesn't address this either way.
Then inspect the report

What a report gives you

The evidence behind each verdict, laid out plainly.

1
Every claim, answered
A verdict beside the story claim.
2
The passage it rests on
The study's own words underneath.
3
What the story left out
Missing caveats and findings.
4
The study itself
Journal, access, and Tessa depth.
One claim, simplified
OverstatedA plain-language version of the report card

The story said

Creatine helped thinking during sleep loss, and the effect peaked after four hours and lasted up to nine hours.

The study found

The study measured people at 3, 5.5, and 7.5 hours. It did not show a four-hour peak or a nine-hour duration.

NewsLink calls this overstated: the story goes further than the paper.

“subjects were orally administered a high single dose of creatinemonohydrate (0.35 g/kg) while performing cognitive tests during sleep deprivation”
See the whole report
Ready for your own check?

Put the next headline on the trail.

Paste a health story. NewsLink finds the study, gives the short answer, and keeps the evidence one step below.