Several possible studies
Story checked
The 10 Best Sunscreens for Men in 2026, Tested by a Grooming Editor (opens in a new tab)
menshealth.com · 2023-05-09
Short answer
Several possible studiesNo clear answer.
More than one paper fits the article's details, and none fits well enough to single out. Checking claims against the wrong study would be worse than not checking them at all.
Checked against the study summary. The full text wasn't available, so some details couldn't be settled either way.
Share this check
The story
The 10 Best Sunscreens for Men in 2026, Tested by a Grooming Editor
menshealth.com · 2023-05-09
The story’s checkable claims.
Read the original story (opens in a new tab)NewsLink checks it
Several studies could be the source of this story.
More than one paper fits the article's details, and none fits well enough to single out. Checking claims against the wrong study would be worse than not checking them at all.
Open claim evidenceSearch result
Several studies could fit.
More than one paper fits the article's details, and none fits well enough to single out. Checking claims against the wrong study would be worse than not checking them at all.
Evidence layer
Claim by claim
What the story asserts. With no source study, there is nothing to check these against.
Reading mode
Scan verdicts. Open evidence only when needed.
Claim 1 of 8Not checkedThe article says sunscreen should be worn year-round whenever you step outside, because UV rays can damage skin, worsen signs of aging, and increase skin-cancer risk.View evidenceHide evidence
As statedyear-round use; sun damage can occur in as little as 15 minutes
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 2 of 8Not checkedIt states that UV exposure damages skin-cell DNA and creates reactive oxygen species, both of which increase skin-cancer risk, and that the sun also breaks down collagen, leading to wrinkles and fine lines.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 3 of 8Not checkedThe article recommends La Roche-Posay Anthelios as the top sunscreen overall, describing it as lightweight, fast-absorbing, broad-spectrum, water-resistant for 80 minutes, non-comedogenic, and suitable for acne-prone skin.View evidenceHide evidence
As statedwater-resistant for 80 minutes
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 4 of 8Not checkedIt recommends EltaMD UV Clear for sensitive or acne-prone skin, saying it uses zinc oxide plus niacinamide and hyaluronic acid, but is not water- or sweat-resistant.View evidenceHide evidence
As statednot water- or sweat-resistant; about 20 minutes in water
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 5 of 8Not checkedIt says Neutrogena Hydro Boost is a good option for darker skin tones because it is lightweight, non-greasy, nearly invisible on skin, and water-resistant for up to 80 minutes.View evidenceHide evidence
As statedwater-resistant for up to 80 minutes
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 6 of 8Not checkedThe article presents several other category picks, including Supergoop Play Everyday, Freaks of Nature Peak Performance, Marlowe No. 128 Facial Lotion SPF 50, Coppertone Every Tone SPF 60+, Oars and Alps Go Stick, Malin and Goetz SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen, and Vacation Orange Gelee SPF 30 Spray.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 7 of 8Not checkedThe piece gives general sunscreen guidance: broad-spectrum coverage matters, SPF 30 is the minimum most dermatologists recommend, SPF 50 protects against about 98% of rays, SPF 60 against about 98.5%, and sunscreen should be reapplied every two to three hours when exposed to sun.View evidenceHide evidence
As statedSPF 30 protects from 97% of rays; SPF 50 from 98%; SPF 60 from 98.5%; SPF 70 from 99%
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 8 of 8Not checkedIt explains that mineral sunscreens generally use zinc oxide or titanium dioxide and are better for sensitive or acne-prone skin, while chemical sunscreens tend to be lighter and clearer but may irritate sensitive skin and can contain ingredients linked to reef damage.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Method layer
No single source study was found.
NewsLink still surfaces nearby research so you can inspect the field instead of a single paper.
Nearby research
No exact source, but these papers are close.
PubMed, Crossref, Europe PMC · 15 candidate papers
Licuri Oil (Syagrus coronata) as a Natural Oily Core for Cationic Polymeric Nanocapsules for Topical Formulation: Development, Characterization, and Incorporation into Hydrogels.
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026 · PubMed
Prevention of Skin Cancer: Healthy Sun Exposure and No sunscreen for Intense Intermittent Exposure; Photoaging Theories Questioned and New Strategies
Journal of Dermatology Research · 2022 · Crossref
Melanocyte-Fibroblast Crosstalk Under Visible Light and Infrared-A Exposure: A Narrative Review of Implications for Photoaging and Dyschromia.
2026 · Europe PMC
Beyond Melanin: A Literature Review of Photoprotection Mechanisms and Gaps in Skin of Color.
Cureus · 2026 · PubMed, Europe PMC
The Chronic Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Skin: Photoaging
Photodermatology · 2007 · Crossref
And 10 more candidates considered.