Skip to main content
Tessa NewsLink
Paste a health news link, or browse

Source study found

Story checked

Social Physiology: Human homeostasis is more efficient in social proximity | Science Advances (opens in a new tab)

science.org · 2012-05-15

Short answerEvidenceSource

Short answer

Mostly not supported

Mostly not supported.

2 claims go further than the study. 2 other points were not covered by the paper.

  • 1 supported
  • 2 overstated
  • 2 not covered

Checked against the study summary. The full text wasn't available, so some details couldn't be settled either way.

Share this check

Follow the evidence trail
1
2

NewsLink checks it

Mostly not supported

Two of five claims overstate the study. One of five checks out. Two claims the study doesn't address.

  • 1 supported
  • 2 overstated
  • 2 not covered
Open claim evidence
3
Source paper

Source layer

The 239 papers the story cites

Source study separated from background citations.

The research anchor for the report.

Then inspect each claim

Evidence layer

Claim by claim

Each claim gets a verdict. Expand it to see the evidence directly below.

5 claims in this story

Showing all 5 claimsChoose a verdict to focus the list.

Claim 1 of 5OverstatedThe study reveals a robust phenomenon in human physiology: homeostasis regulation is more efficient in social proximity.View evidenceHide evidence

As statedrobust phenomenon

Why this verdict

The abstract-level profile supports a Social vs Alone benefit across glucose, thermoregulation, and sympathetic-regulation experiments, but the story’s lead framing as a broad, unqualified and 'robust phenomenon in human physiology' goes beyond the abstract evidence. The profile lacks effect sizes, uncertainty estimates, and full methodological details, and the claim is broader than the specified tested systems. The lead also outruns the story’s own later caveats about limited generalization and long-term inference.

1

Study evidence

Following a carbohydrate challenge, participants in the Social condition exhibited more efficient glucose homeostasis than those in the Alone condition, with lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (n = 108).

“In a set of preregistered experiments, we found that glucose homeostasis following a carbohydrate challenge is more efficient in a Social condition than an Alone condition, exhibiting lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (n = 108).”
2

Study evidence

In a preregistered adult human experiment (n = 116), social proximity (Social vs Alone) was associated with more efficient thermoregulatory homeostasis during a cold challenge, described as a replication of the social benefit observed in other physiological domains.

“The social benefit in homeostasis replicated in thermoregulation during a cold challenge (n = 116)”
Claim 2 of 5OverstatedThe article says the findings suggest social proximity improves homeostatic efficiency and may help explain links between social connection, health, and longevity.View evidenceHide evidence

Why this verdict

The profile supports the narrower idea that social proximity was associated with more efficient homeostatic regulation in the tested experimental challenges, and the paper interprets this as supporting a Social Physiology framework. But extending this to explain links between social connection, health, and longevity goes beyond the supplied evidence, which reports acute experimental physiology outcomes and no long-term health or longevity outcomes. The hedging helps, but the extrapolation remains stronger than the abstract-level evidence.

1

Study evidence

Following a carbohydrate challenge, participants in the Social condition exhibited more efficient glucose homeostasis than those in the Alone condition, with lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (n = 108).

“In a set of preregistered experiments, we found that glucose homeostasis following a carbohydrate challenge is more efficient in a Social condition than an Alone condition, exhibiting lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (n = 108).”
2

Study evidence

In a preregistered adult human experiment (n = 116), social proximity (Social vs Alone) was associated with more efficient thermoregulatory homeostasis during a cold challenge, described as a replication of the social benefit observed in other physiological domains.

“The social benefit in homeostasis replicated in thermoregulation during a cold challenge (n = 116)”
Claim 3 of 5Not coveredGlucose regulation was more efficient in social proximity, independent of touch or stress.View evidenceHide evidence

Why this verdict

The glucose portion is supported at abstract depth: the Social condition showed lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery after a carbohydrate challenge. However, the added qualifier that the effect was independent of touch or stress is not established in the supplied abstract-level profile. Touch/mediation analyses and stress-independence are not available at this evidence depth.

1

Study evidence

Following a carbohydrate challenge, participants in the Social condition exhibited more efficient glucose homeostasis than those in the Alone condition, with lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (n = 108).

“In a set of preregistered experiments, we found that glucose homeostasis following a carbohydrate challenge is more efficient in a Social condition than an Alone condition, exhibiting lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (n = 108).”
Claim 4 of 5Not coveredThe article says touch contributed to thermoregulation but was not a reliable mediator of the Social Physiology effects across experiments.View evidenceHide evidence

Why this verdict

The abstract-level profile supports a thermoregulation benefit in the Social condition, but it does not report whether touch contributed to thermoregulation or whether touch mediated effects across experiments. The mediation claim is therefore not verifiable from the supplied abstract-level evidence.

1

Study evidence

In a preregistered adult human experiment (n = 116), social proximity (Social vs Alone) was associated with more efficient thermoregulatory homeostasis during a cold challenge, described as a replication of the social benefit observed in other physiological domains.

“The social benefit in homeostasis replicated in thermoregulation during a cold challenge (n = 116)”
Claim 5 of 5SupportedThe effect generalized across all tested homeostatic systems, including glucose metabolism, thermoregulation, and sympathetic arousal in adults, as well as sympathetic arousal in infants.View evidenceHide evidence

As statedall tested homeostatic systems

Why this verdict

The profile reports the social-proximity benefit for glucose homeostasis, thermoregulation during cold challenge, sympathetic regulation during stress in adults, and sympathetic regulation during stress in infants. Because the claim is limited to 'all tested homeostatic systems' listed in the profile, the cross-system generalization is supported at abstract depth, though without quantitative details.

1

Study evidence

Following a carbohydrate challenge, participants in the Social condition exhibited more efficient glucose homeostasis than those in the Alone condition, with lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (n = 108).

“In a set of preregistered experiments, we found that glucose homeostasis following a carbohydrate challenge is more efficient in a Social condition than an Alone condition, exhibiting lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (n = 108).”
2

Study evidence

In a preregistered adult human experiment (n = 116), social proximity (Social vs Alone) was associated with more efficient thermoregulatory homeostasis during a cold challenge, described as a replication of the social benefit observed in other physiological domains.

“The social benefit in homeostasis replicated in thermoregulation during a cold challenge (n = 116)”
Then look for missing context

Context layer

What the story carried across

Nothing material from the study was dropped.

7 things the story did carry across
  • Preregistered adult human Social vs Alone carbohydrate-challenge experiment: glucose homeostasis was more efficient in the Social condition, with lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery, n=108.
  • Adult human Social vs Alone cold-challenge experiment: the social benefit replicated in thermoregulation, n=116.
  • Adult human Social vs Alone stress experiment: the social benefit replicated in sympathetic regulation during stress, n=115.
  • Infant stress experiment: sympathetic/autonomic regulation during stress was reported as more efficient in social proximity/caregiver proximity than in an Alone or reduced-proximity condition, n=56.
  • The paper profile frames the set of findings as support for a Social Physiology framework in which physiological homeostasis can be more efficient in social proximity and may contribute to social-bond emergence or maintenance.
  • Generalisability beyond the studied samples and contexts cannot be assessed from the abstract-level profile; participant characteristics and eligibility criteria are not specified.
  • The abstract-level profile does not establish mechanisms or mediators, including whether effects are driven by touch, hormonal pathways, psychological processes, or specific autonomic mechanisms.
Then read the study layer

Study layer

Study at a glance

Scan the study first. Expand only the parts you want to inspect.

Pieces of work

4

Evidence read

study summary

Lead result

human in vivo

1Lead resulthuman in vivoTest whether social proximity improves efficiency of glucose homeostasis after a carbohydrate challenge (Social vs Alone) in adults.Preregistered human experiment: Social vs Alone during carbohydrate (glucose) challengeExpand

In plain English

Preregistered human experiment (n = 108 adults) testing whether social proximity (Social vs Alone) alters glucose homeostasis after a carbohydrate challenge. The Social condition showed more efficient homeostasis, characterized by lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery.

Key findings

  • Following a carbohydrate challenge, participants in the Social condition exhibited more efficient glucose homeostasis than those in the Alone condition, with lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (n = 108).
“In a set of preregistered experiments, we found that glucose homeostasis following a carbohydrate challenge is more efficient in a Social condition than an Alone condition, exhibiting lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (n = 108).”
What this piece can’t prove
  • Abstract does not specify whether analyses were adjusted for potential confounders or the preregistered analysis plan details.

2 further details could not be confirmed from the summary.

2human in vivoReplicate the social-proximity benefit in thermoregulation during a cold challenge (Social vs Alone) in adults.Preregistered experimental manipulation (Social vs Alone) during cold exposure in human adultsExpand

In plain English

A preregistered human experiment in adults (n = 116) reported that social proximity (Social vs Alone) replicated a social benefit for homeostasis: thermoregulatory homeostasis during a cold exposure challenge was more efficient in the Social condition than in the Alone condition.

Key findings

  • In a preregistered adult human experiment (n = 116), social proximity (Social vs Alone) was associated with more efficient thermoregulatory homeostasis during a cold challenge, described as a replication of the social benefit observed in other physiological domains.
“The social benefit in homeostasis replicated in thermoregulation during a cold challenge (n = 116)”
What this piece can’t prove
  • Summary is based solely on the abstract; full methods and results are not available in the provided text.

2 further details could not be confirmed from the summary.

3human in vivoTest/replicate the social-proximity benefit in sympathetic regulation during stress in adults (Social vs Alone).preregistered experimental manipulation (Social vs Alone)Expand

In plain English

The paper reports a preregistered human experiment in adults (n = 115) testing whether social proximity (Social vs Alone) enhances the efficiency of sympathetic regulation during an induced stress challenge. According to the abstract, the Social condition showed a replication of the social benefit in homeostasis for sympathetic responses: lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery compared with Alone.

Key findings

  • In adults (n = 115), sympathetic regulation during an induced stress challenge was more efficient in the Social versus Alone condition, exhibiting lower perturbation amplitude and faster recovery (reported as a replication).
“The social benefit in homeostasis replicated ... in sympathetic regulation during stress in adults (n = 115)”
What this piece can’t prove
  • Unclear which specific sympathetic markers and analytic procedures were used to derive amplitude and recovery metrics.

3 further details could not be confirmed from the summary.

4human in vivoTest/replicate the social-proximity benefit in sympathetic regulation during stress in infants (Social vs Alone / caregiver proximity).Human infant stress experiment contrasting caregiver presence/proximity vs reduced social proximityExpand

In plain English

The paper reports that, in infants (n = 56), sympathetic/autonomic regulation during a stress challenge was more efficient when in social proximity (caregiver presence/proximity) than in an Alone/reduced-proximity condition, described as a replication of the broader social-physiology benefit.

Key findings

  • In infants (n = 56), the authors report that sympathetic/autonomic regulation during a stress challenge was more efficient in a Social proximity (caregiver present/proximal) condition than in an Alone/reduced-proximity condition, described as a replication of the social-physiology effect.
“The social benefit in homeostasis replicated ... in sympathetic regulation during stress in adults (n = 115) and infants (n = 56).”
What this piece can’t prove
  • Summary based on abstract text only; methods, measurement details, and statistical results for the infant experiment are not available in the provided text.
  • Unclear how social proximity was operationalized for infants (physical contact, visual proximity, caregiver behavior) and whether procedures were identical to adult experiments.

2 further details could not be confirmed from the summary.

Finally, the search trail

Method layer

NewsLink found the paper. Tessa takes you deeper.

NewsLink checks the story. Tessa is where you inspect the paper, authors, evidence, and research context.

Papers considered

The selected paper, plus nearby candidates.

PubMed, Europe PMC, Crossref · 142 candidate papers

And 136 more candidates considered.