Source study found
Story checked
Nearly one-third of new nurse practitioners trained at for-profit schools (opens in a new tab)
news-medical.net · 2026-10-09
Short answer
Needs reviewStudy found.
We found the study, but the claim check did not finish.
Checked against the study summary. The full text wasn't available, so some details couldn't be settled either way.
Share this check
The story
Nearly one-third of new nurse practitioners trained at for-profit schools
news-medical.net · 2026-10-09
The story’s checkable claims.
Read the original story (opens in a new tab)NewsLink checks it
We found the study behind this story.
We found the study, but couldn't compare the story to it: the study's evidence could not be profiled.
Open claim evidenceThe source study
Growth in the Share of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Educated at For-Profit Programs in Four U.S. States
Evidence layer
Claim by claim
The source study was found, but the study's evidence could not be profiled, so these claims couldn't be checked.
Reading mode
Scan verdicts. Open evidence only when needed.
Claim 1 of 5Not checkedA study found that nearly one-third of newly licensed nurse practitioners in four states were educated at for-profit programs in 2024, up from 2.4% in 2010.View evidenceHide evidence
As statednearly one-third; 2.4% in 2010
Not checked
The source study was found, but this claim couldn't be checked against it.
Claim 2 of 5Not checkedThe study examined 117,156 nurse practitioners licensed in California, Florida, Iowa and Texas from 2010 to 2024.View evidenceHide evidence
As stated117,156 nurse practitioners; four states; 2010 to 2024
Not checked
The source study was found, but this claim couldn't be checked against it.
Claim 3 of 5Not checkedAmong new licensees, the share of for-profit-trained nurse practitioners was highest in California at 40.9%, followed by Florida at 35.1%, Texas at 21.1% and Iowa at 14.8%.View evidenceHide evidence
As stated40.9%, 35.1%, 21.1%, 14.8%
Not checked
The source study was found, but this claim couldn't be checked against it.
Claim 4 of 5Not checkedThe authors voiced concern that the growing number of for-profit-trained nurse practitioners could affect quality of care, citing prior evidence that for-profit nursing education predicted lower NCLEX pass rates.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
The source study was found, but this claim couldn't be checked against it.
Claim 5 of 5Not checkedBarnett said more disclosure of licensure exam pass rates and other student statistics is needed, and that researchers should examine patient outcomes by nurse practitioner training background.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
The source study was found, but this claim couldn't be checked against it.
Method layer
NewsLink found the paper. Tessa takes you deeper.
NewsLink checks the story. Tessa is where you inspect the paper, authors, evidence, and research context.
Open the paper in Tessa
Growth in the Share of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Educated at For-Profit Programs in Four U.S. States
Annals of internal medicine · 2026
Why this one
Near certain
NewsLink found the paper. Tessa is where you inspect it deeply.
Papers considered
The selected paper, plus nearby candidates.
PubMed, Crossref, Europe PMC · 35 candidate papers
Growth in the Share of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Educated at For-Profit Programs in Four U.S. States
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2026 · PubMed, Crossref
Trends in Evaluation and Management Service Intensity, 2018–2024
Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2026 · Crossref
Author reply
Internal Medicine Journal · 2026 · Crossref
Author Index
Internal Medicine Journal · 2026 · Crossref
Author reply to Dharma: Digital interventions to improve glycaemia control
Internal Medicine Journal · 2026 · Crossref
A Thousand Letters
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2026 · Crossref
And 29 more candidates considered.