Skip to main content
Tessa NewsLink
Paste a health news link, or browse
Latest checks

Source study found

Story checked

Narcissistic brains show less consistent activation during shared embarrassment (opens in a new tab)

news-medical.net · 2026-10-27

Short answerEvidenceSource

Short answer

Mixed

Mixed.

One claim goes further than the study. 2 other points were not covered by the paper.

  • 2 supported
  • 1 overstated
  • 2 not covered

Checked against the study summary. The full text wasn't available, so some details couldn't be settled either way.

Share this check

Follow the evidence trail
1
2

NewsLink checks it

Mixed

One claim overstates the study. Two of five check out. Two claims the study doesn't address.

  • 2 supported
  • 1 overstated
  • 2 not covered
Open claim evidence
3
Then inspect each claim

Evidence layer

Claim by claim

Each claim gets a verdict. Expand it to see the evidence directly below.

5 claims in this story

Showing all 5 claimsChoose a verdict to focus the list.

Then look for missing context

Context layer

What the story left out

Important study details the story did not include.

  • Negative or nonsignificant result: the hypothesized aINS ISC difference did not reach statistical significance.

    The story presentation does not mention the aINS null/nonsignificant finding. This matters because the paper tested multiple empathy-related ROIs and not all hypothesized regions showed significant differences.

    From fMRI naturalistic viewing with group stratification (high vs low grandiose narcissism); ROI ISC analysis

5 things the story did carry across
  • Primary design: human fMRI study comparing high versus low grandiose narcissism groups during passive viewing of naturalistic videos involving another person receiving face-threatening feedback.
  • Primary outcome: intersubject correlation/neural coupling in predefined social-brain ROIs, not a general unrestricted measure of all brain activation.
  • Main supported result: high-grandiose-narcissism participants showed reduced ISC in dlPFC and PCC compared with low-narcissism participants.
  • Sample size: high n=28 and low n=30, for 58 imaging participants total.
  • Causal limitation: the study is observational/group-stratified and supports associations between grandiose narcissistic traits and neural synchrony, not proof that narcissistic traits cause the neural differences.
Then read the study layer

Study layer

Study at a glance

Scan the study first. Expand only the parts you want to inspect.

Pieces of work

1

Evidence read

study summary

Lead result

human in vivo

1Lead resulthuman in vivoTest whether grandiose narcissistic traits are associated with reduced neural coupling (intersubject correlation, ISC) in empathy-related social-brain regions while watching naturalistic videos of another person receiving face-threatening feedback.fMRI naturalistic viewing with group stratification (high vs low grandiose narcissism); ROI ISC analysisExpand

In plain English

Human fMRI study testing whether grandiose narcissistic traits are associated with reduced intersubject correlation (ISC) in empathy-related social-brain ROIs while participants watched videos of another person receiving face-threatening feedback. Participants were stratified into high (n = 28) and low (n = 30) grandiose narcissism groups. ISC was compared between groups in a priori ROIs (dlPFC, PCC, aINS); the high-narcissism group showed reduced ISC in dlPFC and PCC, while the aINS effect did not reach significance.

Key findings

  • High-grandiose-narcissism participants showed reduced intersubject correlation (ISC) in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) compared with low-narcissism participants while watching another person receive face-threatening feedback.reduced ISC (directional; magnitude not reported in abstract)
  • High-grandiose-narcissism participants showed reduced ISC in posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) relative to low-narcissism participants.reduced ISC (directional; magnitude not reported in abstract)
“Participants with high (n = 28) and low (n = 30) scores in grandiose narcissism watched videos during functional magnetic resonance imaging”
What this piece can’t prove
  • Group sizes are modest (n = 28 and n = 30), which may limit precision of estimates.

2 further details could not be confirmed from the summary.

Finally, the search trail

Method layer

NewsLink found the paper. Tessa takes you deeper.

NewsLink checks the story. Tessa is where you inspect the paper, authors, evidence, and research context.

Papers considered

The selected paper, plus nearby candidates.

PubMed, Crossref, Europe PMC · 37 candidate papers

Candidate

Time-Lapse Imaging of Transfected Primary Mouse Cerebral Cortex Cells

Journal of Visualized Experiments · 2026 · Crossref

Candidate

Measuring Cerebral Blood Volume in the Auditory Cortex Using Vascular Space Occupancy

Journal of Visualized Experiments · 2026 · Crossref

And 31 more candidates considered.