Several possible studies
Story checked
Mountain Hardwear Alakazam 45 Backpack Review: Ultralight Yet Pricey (opens in a new tab)
menshealth.com · 2026-09-09
Short answer
Several possible studiesNo clear answer.
More than one paper fits the article's details, and none fits well enough to single out. Checking claims against the wrong study would be worse than not checking them at all.
Checked against the study summary. The full text wasn't available, so some details couldn't be settled either way.
Share this check
The story
Mountain Hardwear Alakazam 45 Backpack Review: Ultralight Yet Pricey
menshealth.com · 2026-09-09
The story’s checkable claims.
Read the original story (opens in a new tab)NewsLink checks it
Several studies could be the source of this story.
More than one paper fits the article's details, and none fits well enough to single out. Checking claims against the wrong study would be worse than not checking them at all.
Open claim evidenceSearch result
Several studies could fit.
More than one paper fits the article's details, and none fits well enough to single out. Checking claims against the wrong study would be worse than not checking them at all.
Evidence layer
Claim by claim
What the story asserts. With no source study, there is nothing to check these against.
Reading mode
Scan verdicts. Open evidence only when needed.
Claim 1 of 9Not checkedMountain Hardwear’s Alakazam hiking backpack series is described as next-gen ultralight gear with cutting-edge materials, a barely-there construction, and bulletproof durability.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 2 of 9Not checkedThe Alakazam 45 uses ALUULA shell fabric, which the article says is adhesive-free, reduces seams, won’t fray or delaminate, and is lighter and more durable than Dyneema used in comparable packs.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 3 of 9Not checkedThe reviewer says the pack is completely weatherproof and had no water getting inside during light and moderate rain.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 4 of 9Not checkedThe M/L size weighs 1 pound 14.3 ounces, putting it in the sub-two-pound ultralight category.View evidenceHide evidence
As stated1 pound 14.3 ounces
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 5 of 9Not checkedThe article says the pack is very comfortable to carry because of its load lifters, V-shaped frame, and proprietary Gait Keeper hipbelt that swivels as the wearer moves.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 6 of 9Not checkedThe main drawback is price: the article says both bags in the Alakazam series cost nearly $600.View evidenceHide evidence
As statednearly $600
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 7 of 9Not checkedThe review says the pack lacks hydration reservoir compatibility, despite having an interior sleeve pocket that could fit a reservoir.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 8 of 9Not checkedThe reviewer criticizes the side pockets and hipbelt pockets as too deep, floppy, and small, making water bottles and smartphones hard to access.View evidenceHide evidence
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Claim 9 of 9Not checkedAs an alternative, the article recommends Mountain Hardwear’s Kazam 45, which it says uses traditional ripstop nylon/polyethylene, weighs 10 to 11 ounces more, and costs roughly half as much.View evidenceHide evidence
As stated10 to 11 ounces; roughly half the price
Not checked
NewsLink could not identify one source study, so this claim was not compared against a paper.
Method layer
No single source study was found.
NewsLink still surfaces nearby research so you can inspect the field instead of a single paper.
Nearby research
No exact source, but these papers are close.
PubMed, Crossref, Europe PMC · 15 candidate papers
The Influence of Backpack Weight and Hip Belt Tension on Movement and Loading in the Pelvis and Lower Limbs during Walking.
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics · 2018 · PubMed
A backpack load sharing model to evaluate lumbar and hip joint contact forces during shoulder borne and hip belt assisted load carriage
Applied Ergonomics · 2021 · Crossref
School Bag Design and Weight: A Narrative Review of Their Impact on Children's Posture and Musculoskeletal Health.
2025 · Europe PMC
Integrating a hip belt with body armour reduces the magnitude and changes the location of shoulder pressure and perceived discomfort in soldiers.
Ergonomics · 2018 · PubMed
The effect of hip belt use and load placement in a backpack on postural stability and perceived exertion: a within-subjects trial
Ergonomics · 2015 · Crossref
And 10 more candidates considered.