Source study found
Story checked
Cold temperatures may raise eye pressure in glaucoma patients (opens in a new tab)
news-medical.net · 2026-09-29
Short answer
MixedMixed.
The claims we could check match the study, but some claims were not covered by the evidence reviewed.
- 2 supported
- 4 not covered
Checked against the study summary. The full text wasn't available, so some details couldn't be settled either way.
Share this check
The story
Cold temperatures may raise eye pressure in glaucoma patients
news-medical.net · 2026-09-29
The story’s checkable claims.
Read the original story (opens in a new tab)NewsLink checks it
Mixed
Every claim we could check holds up. Two of six claims match the study. This overall rating is based only on the claims we could check. Four claims the study doesn't address.
- 2 supported
- 4 not covered
The source study
Effects of ambient temperature on intraocular pressure in patients with stable primary open-angle glaucoma under medical treatment
Evidence layer
Claim by claim
Each claim gets a verdict. Expand it to see the evidence directly below.
Reading mode
Scan verdicts. Open evidence only when needed.
Browse by verdict
6 claims in this storyShowing all 6 claimsChoose a verdict to focus the list.
Claim 1 of 6Not coveredPeople with more severe glaucoma seem to be more susceptible to the effects of ambient temperature.View evidenceHide evidence
Why this verdict
The abstract profile reports overall temperature-IOP association and lists glaucoma stage/type among model covariates, but it does not report that patients with more severe glaucoma were more susceptible to ambient temperature or that there was a severity-by-temperature interaction/subgroup effect.
Study evidence
Ambient temperature was negatively associated with intraocular pressure in the adjusted longitudinal mixed-effects model.estimate = −0.029; p = 0.003
“This retrospective study analysed longitudinal IOP data via Goldmann applanation tonometer of POAG patients treated ... from 2012 to 2023.”
Study evidence
Mean blood pressure (mBP) was positively correlated with intraocular pressure (IOP) in the multivariable model.estimate=0.021; p<0.001
“Fixed effects included age, mean deviation of Humphrey Visual Field Perimetry, corneal curvature radius, central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length, mean blood pressure (mBP), heart rate, ambient temperature, atmospheric pressure, relative humidity, wind speed, precipitation, sunshine duration, sex, glaucoma type, glaucoma stage, number of eye-drops used, season, time of day and weather.”
Claim 2 of 6Not coveredA lower ambient air temperature was associated with a significant increase in intraocular pressure, and a decrease in ambient temperature of 35°C was associated with a 1 mmHg increase in intraocular pressure.View evidenceHide evidence
As stated35°C decrease associated with 1 mmHg increase
Why this verdict
The significant negative association is supported by the abstract profile: estimate = -0.029, p = 0.003. However, the story's conversion to a 35°C decrease being associated with a 1 mmHg increase depends on the estimate's unit/scaling, which the abstract profile explicitly says is not specified at this depth.
Study evidence
Ambient temperature was negatively associated with intraocular pressure in the adjusted longitudinal mixed-effects model.estimate = −0.029; p = 0.003
“This retrospective study analysed longitudinal IOP data via Goldmann applanation tonometer of POAG patients treated ... from 2012 to 2023.”
Claim 3 of 6Not coveredAir temperature was significantly associated with intraocular pressure only in patients with severe glaucoma or those using multiple eye drops.View evidenceHide evidence
Why this verdict
The abstract profile says number of eye-drops, glaucoma type, and time of day had significant effects on IOP fluctuation, but it does not state that ambient temperature was significantly associated with IOP only in severe glaucoma patients or only among those using multiple drops. The 'only' subgroup framing is not verifiable from the abstract profile.
Study evidence
Ambient temperature was negatively associated with intraocular pressure in the adjusted longitudinal mixed-effects model.estimate = −0.029; p = 0.003
“This retrospective study analysed longitudinal IOP data via Goldmann applanation tonometer of POAG patients treated ... from 2012 to 2023.”
Study evidence
Mean blood pressure (mBP) was positively correlated with intraocular pressure (IOP) in the multivariable model.estimate=0.021; p<0.001
“Fixed effects included age, mean deviation of Humphrey Visual Field Perimetry, corneal curvature radius, central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length, mean blood pressure (mBP), heart rate, ambient temperature, atmospheric pressure, relative humidity, wind speed, precipitation, sunshine duration, sex, glaucoma type, glaucoma stage, number of eye-drops used, season, time of day and weather.”
Claim 4 of 6Not coveredThe researchers say further research with larger groups is needed, and note that the study was observational and could not establish cause and effect.View evidenceHide evidence
Why this verdict
The observational, non-causal limitation is supported by the paper profile. However, the full claim also attributes to the researchers a need for further research with larger groups, which is not directly reported in the abstract-level profile, though it is consistent with the small single-center cohort limitation.
Study evidence
Ambient temperature was negatively associated with intraocular pressure in the adjusted longitudinal mixed-effects model.estimate = −0.029; p = 0.003
“This retrospective study analysed longitudinal IOP data via Goldmann applanation tonometer of POAG patients treated ... from 2012 to 2023.”
Study evidence
Mean blood pressure (mBP) was positively correlated with intraocular pressure (IOP) in the multivariable model.estimate=0.021; p<0.001
“Fixed effects included age, mean deviation of Humphrey Visual Field Perimetry, corneal curvature radius, central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length, mean blood pressure (mBP), heart rate, ambient temperature, atmospheric pressure, relative humidity, wind speed, precipitation, sunshine duration, sex, glaucoma type, glaucoma stage, number of eye-drops used, season, time of day and weather.”
Claim 5 of 6SupportedLower air temperatures may be associated with an increase in intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.View evidenceHide evidence
Why this verdict
The abstract-profiled primary result reports that ambient temperature was negatively associated with intraocular pressure in stable primary open-angle glaucoma patients, meaning lower temperature corresponds to higher IOP. The story frames this as a hedged association, which matches the observational evidence.
Study evidence
Ambient temperature was negatively associated with intraocular pressure in the adjusted longitudinal mixed-effects model.estimate = −0.029; p = 0.003
“This retrospective study analysed longitudinal IOP data via Goldmann applanation tonometer of POAG patients treated ... from 2012 to 2023.”
Claim 6 of 6SupportedThe researchers reviewed medical records of 77 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma treated at a university hospital in Japan between January 2012 and December 2023.View evidenceHide evidence
As stated77 patients
Why this verdict
The abstract profile supports a retrospective clinical-record/longitudinal analysis of 77 POAG patients at Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Hospital during 2012–2023. The exact month endpoints are not detailed in the abstract profile, but the core sample, condition, setting, and year range are supported.
Study evidence
Ambient temperature was negatively associated with intraocular pressure in the adjusted longitudinal mixed-effects model.estimate = −0.029; p = 0.003
“This retrospective study analysed longitudinal IOP data via Goldmann applanation tonometer of POAG patients treated ... from 2012 to 2023.”
Context layer
What the story left out
Important study details the story did not include.
Quantitative estimate: ambient temperature association estimate = -0.029 with p = 0.003, with the abstract profile not specifying the unit/scaling of the temperature increment.
The story translates the estimate into a 35°C decrease corresponding to 1 mmHg higher IOP, but it does not acknowledge the abstract-level limitation that the increment/scaling is not specified in the profile.
From retrospective longitudinal observational study
Sample structure: 2,655 IOP measurements from 154 eyes of 77 patients, with mean follow-up of about 5.2 years.
The story states the number of patients but does not reflect the repeated-measures structure, number of eyes, or mean follow-up, which are material to understanding the longitudinal model.
From retrospective longitudinal observational study; Retrospective longitudinal cohort; multivariable linear mixed-effects mo
Secondary covariate findings: mean blood pressure was positively associated with IOP; CCT and season showed trends; number of eye-drops, glaucoma type, and time of day significantly affected IOP fluctuation.
The story mentions multiple eye drops in a temperature-susceptibility framing, but it does not convey the broader secondary covariate findings reported in the abstract profile, especially mean blood pressure and time-of-day effects.
From Retrospective longitudinal cohort; multivariable linear mixed-effects model (eye-level random effect)
Generalizability limitation: the cohort was single-center and selected for stable management, including no surgery, no medication change, age ≥40, and frequent follow-up.
The story notes a Japanese university-hospital setting and says no poorly controlled IOP patients were included, but it does not fully present the single-center/selected stable-treatment eligibility constraints as a limitation on generalizability.
From retrospective longitudinal observational study; Retrospective longitudinal cohort; multivariable linear mixed-effects mo
3 things the story did carry across
- Primary study design and setting: a retrospective longitudinal observational study of medically treated, stable primary open-angle glaucoma patients at Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Hospital from 2012–2023.
- Primary finding: ambient temperature was negatively associated with intraocular pressure in the adjusted mixed-effects model.
- Causal limitation: the evidence is retrospective and observational, so causal inference is limited and residual confounding is possible.
Study layer
Study at a glance
Scan the study first. Expand only the parts you want to inspect.
Pieces of work
2
Evidence read
study summary
Lead result
human in vivo
1Lead resulthuman in vivoEstimate the association between ambient temperature and intraocular pressure (IOP) over time in medically treated, stable primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients.retrospective longitudinal observational studyExpandCollapse
In plain English
Retrospective longitudinal observational analysis of repeated Goldmann-applanation IOP measurements from medically treated, stable POAG patients (Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Hospital, 2012–2023) using eye-level linear mixed-effects models to estimate the association between ambient temperature and IOP. In 2655 IOP measurements from 154 eyes of 77 patients (mean age 65.8 years; mean follow-up 5.2 years), ambient temperature was negatively associated with IOP (estimate = −0.029; p = 0.003) after adjustment for multiple clinical and meteorological covariates; mean blood pressure was positively associated with IOP (estimate = 0.021; p < 0.001).
Key findings
- Ambient temperature was negatively associated with intraocular pressure in the adjusted longitudinal mixed-effects model.estimate = −0.029; p = 0.003
- Mean blood pressure was positively associated with intraocular pressure in the adjusted model.estimate = 0.021; p < 0.001
“This retrospective study analysed longitudinal IOP data via Goldmann applanation tonometer of POAG patients treated ... from 2012 to 2023.”
What this piece can’t prove
- Retrospective observational single-center study (Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Hospital).
- Selected study population: patients aged ≥40 years with stable medical management (no surgery, no medication change) and frequent follow-up (≥3 visits/year for ≥3 years), which may limit generalizability.
- Abstract does not specify the temperature increment corresponding to the reported estimate or other model scaling details.
2human in vivoIdentify and adjust for other clinical, ocular, and meteorological factors (eg, mean blood pressure, central corneal thickness, time of day, season, glaucoma type, number of eye-drops) associated with longitudinal IOP variation in this cohort.Retrospective longitudinal cohort; multivariable linear mixed-effects model (eye-level random effect)ExpandCollapse
In plain English
In this retrospective longitudinal cohort of medically treated stable POAG patients (154 eyes of 77 patients; 2,655 IOP measurements; mean follow-up ~5.2 years), multivariable linear mixed-effects modelling with eye as a random effect identified several clinical, ocular, and temporal covariates associated with intraocular pressure (IOP). Mean blood pressure (mBP) was positively associated with IOP (estimate=0.021; p<0.001). Central corneal thickness (CCT) showed a trend toward association. Number of eye-drops used, glaucoma type, and time of day had statistically significant effects on IOP fluctuation; season tended to have an effect. These estimates derive from the same fixed-effects model that adjusted for multiple ocular biometry and meteorological variables.
Key findings
- Mean blood pressure (mBP) was positively correlated with intraocular pressure (IOP) in the multivariable model.estimate=0.021; p<0.001
- Central corneal thickness (CCT) tended to be associated with IOP.
“Fixed effects included age, mean deviation of Humphrey Visual Field Perimetry, corneal curvature radius, central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length, mean blood pressure (mBP), heart rate, ambient temperature, atmospheric pressure, relative humidity, wind speed, precipitation, sunshine duration, sex, glaucoma type, glaucoma stage, number of eye-drops used, season, time of day and weather.”
What this piece can’t prove
- Retrospective observational design limits causal inference and is susceptible to residual confounding and selection biases.
- Single-center cohort (Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Hospital) and inclusion criteria (stable treatment, no surgeries) may limit generalisability to other POAG populations.
- Potential measurement or timing variability in IOP assessments (although time of day was included as a covariate).
1 further detail could not be confirmed from the summary.
Method layer
NewsLink found the paper. Tessa takes you deeper.
NewsLink checks the story. Tessa is where you inspect the paper, authors, evidence, and research context.
Open the paper in Tessa
Effects of ambient temperature on intraocular pressure in patients with stable primary open-angle glaucoma under medical treatment
British Journal of Ophthalmology · 2026
Why this one
Near certain
NewsLink found the paper. Tessa is where you inspect it deeply.
Papers considered
The selected paper, plus nearby candidates.
Crossref, PubMed, Europe PMC · 16 candidate papers
Effects of ambient temperature on intraocular pressure in patients with stable primary open-angle glaucoma under medical treatment
British Journal of Ophthalmology · 2026 · Crossref
Measurement of intraocular temperature in glaucoma: week-day and seasonal fluctuations.
The British Journal of Ophthalmology · 2023 · PubMed
The Beneficial Effects of Photobiomodulation to Reduce Intraocular Pressure in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
Crossref
Multi-omics Mendelian randomization analysis identifies SPATA20 as a cross-omic target in primary open angle glaucoma.
2026 · Europe PMC
Age at Glaucoma Diagnosis in Germline Myocilin Mutation Patients: Associations with Polymorphisms in Protein Stabilities.
Genes · 2021 · PubMed
Altered serum biomarkers of oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity in primary open-angle glaucoma.
2026 · Europe PMC
And 10 more candidates considered.